Note: Wear claims he never heard of me before his dream in which he saw my name in an alien hanger. He claims he had no previous idea that I was involved in UFO research and had had a contact experience of some sort as a child in which it was said I would link up with others in 20 years. Also note Dennis Schmidt cites me and Brian Josephson as inventors of a star ship drive in his book "The Satori Trilogy" written about 10 years ago. I never met Schmidt and have no idea why he used my name and Brian's in that context.
Message-Id: <9506281851.AA02005@katmandu.sware.com>
From: Bill Wear
To: sarfatti@ix.netcom.com (Jack Sarfatti)
Subject: Re: I know this is strange, but....
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 28 Jun 1995 11:33:37 -0700.
<199506281833.LAA03093@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 95 14:51:10 EDT
sarfatti@ix.netcom.com (Jack Sarfatti) writes:
> tell me more
>
The dreams all involve some kind of large building, something like one
of the VAB monsters that Saturn V's were built in, but much more
complicated -- lots of "drawbridges" ? that bridge internal gaps in the
building and "telephone poles" ? that run the length -- at least, they
look something like creosote wooden posts. There're a lot of metal
panels all over (sortof like the crufty ships from Star Wars).
I'm always in the same area -- a large bay, reached by a huge,
frighteningly complex elevator -- I get the _impression_ that others
are coming and going around me, very infrequently, but I can never seem
to turn around fast enough to catch more than a blurred image.
In one corner of the bay is a large viewscreen with a console, looks
very outdated. The viewscreen flashes through a number of
blueprint-type images, under
With the exception of these, I've never remembered any dreams. Oddly
enough, I could probably draw every image I've seen, including
something that looks like some kind of dual-particle-accelerator that
projects two streams of particles (?) onto a oddly-shaped matrix-like
element, from which a near-infinite number of "power-couplings" ? fan
out. I'm using generic TNG terminology because I'm not sure what to
call these things. I have the Next Generation Technical Manual in my
entertainment bookshelf, and what I see looks nothing like the MARA,
although that's the closest thing I've seen to this particular item.
I'm a technical writer and EE who, after struggling through engineering
school, discovered that I have a facility for languages, concepts and
art instead of math (i.e., using wrong side of brain for 25 years). I
enjoy flights of fancy, but I've never gone through anything like this.
You probably think I'm nuts. I decided to do the websearch, hoping
that the name would come up with something useful to control these
dreams -- I always wake up incredibly tired after one of these
sessions.
Sorry if all this seems outlandish. Hope I'm not boring you -- is any
of this of any interest, or should I just quit eating spicy foods late
at night?
Bill
SecureWare, Inc. voice: 404-315-6296 X 143
2957 Clairmont, Ste 200 fax: 404-315-0293
Atlanta, GA 30329-1647 hours: 8:30 - 5:30 EDST
Return-Path:
From: Bill Wear
X-Mailer: SecureMail [2.0 beta]
To: sarfatti@ix.netcom.com (Jack Sarfatti)
Subject: Re: I know this is strange, but....
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 28 Jun 1995 14:53:29 -0700.
<199506282153.OAA29923@ix4.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 95 11:04:22 EDT
sarfatti@ix.netcom.com (Jack Sarfatti) writes:
> Have you ever seen "Sarfatti" before your dream?
>
Not that I know of; it stood out in my mind.
> Are you aware of http://www.hia.com/pcr
>
No, but I'll check it out.
> What is "Secureware"? Do you know Christine Athena Kekenes?
>
Secureware is a company that produces secure unix systems for use on
the Internet, for example, by Internet banks. It's impossible for some
universities and businesses to get federal approval to do business/get
contracts without some guarantee of data protection, so we provide that
protection by modifying the unix kernel.
I don't know the name you mentioned.
Bill
sarfatti@ix.netcom.com (Jack Sarfatti) writes:
> Well this is extremely important if you are not pulling my leg. Please
> go over everything again. Try to draw everything. The details are
> important. Send drawings to me at POB 26548, San Francisco, CA 94126.
>
I'll draw and describe what I've seen and mail it to you. I've glanced
through your web pages by now, so I suspect you're open to the
possibility that this isn't a coincidence. I, myself, am still much
more skeptical, but I haven't had vivid dreams like this before, and
the fact that your name was included out of the blue decreases the odds
of coincidence.
BTW, your guarded, rational attitude and obvious caution makes me a
good bit more comfortable about passing on this information. If at any
point you think this is just a random coincidence and not a real
connection of some kind, please let me know. I don't want to waste a
lot of time with something that's not useful (it has always been one of
my fondest dreams to create "Star Trek" technology -- for a couple of
months, I even felt that God was calling me to do that, but I decided
rather sheepishly later that it was just me wishing, although I still
have that strong desire).
I've printed a portion of the technical material in your webpages to
read and digest much later, after the dreams have stopped (if they do)
and I've recorded them. I don't want to bias my dreams/data with what
I read there. I hope you don't mind, and if you don't think it's a
good idea, I won't read it. I won't share it with anyone else. Thanks
for listening and for not rejecting me out-of-hand.
Bill
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 95 17:08:55 EDT
sarfatti@ix.netcom.com (Jack Sarfatti) writes:
> There is noway this is just a "coincidence". Have you read "Godphone"
> and "Sarfatti's Illuminati" yet? More later.
>
Only glanced at them, will read better momentarily. Have mailed some
very crude sketches and text impressions just now. I'm a little
skeptical because some of it involves generating external fields using
a waveguide. There's something called a "gravity suppression
potentiometer" that has a "field arrangement" diagram I drew. My
impression of the sketch is that the waveguide is generating some kind
of field at a distance. I didn't think waveguides could do that (I
thought they were supposed to contain the wave), but it's entirely
possible that what I'm seeing is an attempt to correlate English with
some other language -- meaning that the translation fails. It's also
possible that I have a lousy understanding of waveguides.
I'll do some more sketches later -- I seem to get really exhausted by
retracing these vivid images, so I have to take long breaks. This
seems really strange. Can you shed any light?
Bill Wear e-mail: bill@sware.com
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 95 13:11:20 EDT
From: Bill Wear 